%global _empty_manifest_terminate_build 0 Name: python-Boruta Version: 0.3 Release: 1 Summary: Python Implementation of Boruta Feature Selection License: BSD 3 clause URL: https://github.com/danielhomola/boruta_py Source0: https://mirrors.nju.edu.cn/pypi/web/packages/d5/ab/800c93706b1919dbdcb48fcab3d5251dbd135fa2ca7cd345f7a4dcb0864b/Boruta-0.3.tar.gz BuildArch: noarch Requires: python3-numpy Requires: python3-scikit-learn Requires: python3-scipy %description # boruta_py # This project hosts Python implementations of the [Boruta all-relevant feature selection method](https://m2.icm.edu.pl/boruta/). [Related blog post] (http://danielhomola.com/2015/05/08/borutapy-an-all-relevant-feature-selection-method/) ## Dependencies ## * numpy * scipy * scikit-learn ## How to use ## Download, import and do as you would with any other scikit-learn method: * fit(X, y) * transform(X) * fit_transform(X, y) ## Description ## Python implementations of the Boruta R package. This implementation tries to mimic the scikit-learn interface, so use fit, transform or fit_transform, to run the feature selection. For more, see the docs of these functions, and the examples below. Original code and method by: Miron B Kursa, https://m2.icm.edu.pl/boruta/ Boruta is an all relevant feature selection method, while most other are minimal optimal; this means it tries to find all features carrying information usable for prediction, rather than finding a possibly compact subset of features on which some classifier has a minimal error. Why bother with all relevant feature selection? When you try to understand the phenomenon that made your data, you should care about all factors that contribute to it, not just the bluntest signs of it in context of your methodology (yes, minimal optimal set of features by definition depends on your classifier choice). ## What's different in BorutaPy? ## It is the original R package recoded in Python with a few added extra features. Some improvements include: * Faster run times, thanks to scikit-learn * Scikit-learn like interface * Compatible with any ensemble method from scikit-learn * Automatic n_estimator selection * Ranking of features For more details, please check the top of the docstring. We highly recommend using pruned trees with a depth between 3-7. Also, after playing around a lot with the original code I identified a few areas where the core algorithm could be improved/altered to make it less strict and more applicable to biological data, where the Bonferroni correction might be overly harsh. __Percentile as threshold__ The original method uses the maximum of the shadow features as a threshold in deciding which real feature is doing better than the shadow ones. This could be overly harsh. To control this, I added the perc parameter, which sets the percentile of the shadow features' importances, the algorithm uses as the threshold. The default of 100 which is equivalent to taking the maximum as the R version of Boruta does, but it could be relaxed. Note, since this is the percentile, it changes with the size of the dataset. With several thousands of features it isn't as stringent as with a few dozens at the end of a Boruta run. __Two step correction for multiple testing__ The correction for multiple testing was relaxed by making it a two step process, rather than a harsh one step Bonferroni correction. We need to correct firstly because in each iteration we test a number of features against the null hypothesis (does a feature perform better than expected by random). For this the Bonferroni correction is used in the original code which is known to be too stringent in such scenarios (at least for biological data), and also the original code corrects for n features, even if we are in the 50th iteration where we only have k< A supervised learning estimator, with a 'fit' method that returns the > feature_importances_ attribute. Important features must correspond to > high absolute values in the feature_importances_. __n_estimators__ : int or string, default = 1000 > If int sets the number of estimators in the chosen ensemble method. > If 'auto' this is determined automatically based on the size of the > dataset. The other parameters of the used estimators need to be set > with initialisation. __perc__ : int, default = 100 > Instead of the max we use the percentile defined by the user, to pick > our threshold for comparison between shadow and real features. The max > tend to be too stringent. This provides a finer control over this. The > lower perc is the more false positives will be picked as relevant but > also the less relevant features will be left out. The usual trade-off. > The default is essentially the vanilla Boruta corresponding to the max. __alpha__ : float, default = 0.05 > Level at which the corrected p-values will get rejected in both correction steps. __two_step__ : Boolean, default = True > If you want to use the original implementation of Boruta with Bonferroni > correction only set this to False. __max_iter__ : int, default = 100 > The number of maximum iterations to perform. __verbose__ : int, default=0 > Controls verbosity of output. ## Attributes ## **n_features_** : int > The number of selected features. **support_** : array of shape [n_features] > The mask of selected features - only confirmed ones are True. **support_weak_** : array of shape [n_features] > The mask of selected tentative features, which haven't gained enough > support during the max_iter number of iterations.. **ranking_** : array of shape [n_features] > The feature ranking, such that ``ranking_[i]`` corresponds to the > ranking position of the i-th feature. Selected (i.e., estimated > best) features are assigned rank 1 and tentative features are assigned > rank 2. ## Examples ## import pandas as pd from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier from boruta import BorutaPy # load X and y # NOTE BorutaPy accepts numpy arrays only, hence the .values attribute X = pd.read_csv('examples/test_X.csv', index_col=0).values y = pd.read_csv('examples/test_y.csv', header=None, index_col=0).values y = y.ravel() # define random forest classifier, with utilising all cores and # sampling in proportion to y labels rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_jobs=-1, class_weight='balanced', max_depth=5) # define Boruta feature selection method feat_selector = BorutaPy(rf, n_estimators='auto', verbose=2, random_state=1) # find all relevant features - 5 features should be selected feat_selector.fit(X, y) # check selected features - first 5 features are selected feat_selector.support_ # check ranking of features feat_selector.ranking_ # call transform() on X to filter it down to selected features X_filtered = feat_selector.transform(X) ## References ## 1. Kursa M., Rudnicki W., "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package" Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 36, Issue 11, Sep 2010 %package -n python3-Boruta Summary: Python Implementation of Boruta Feature Selection Provides: python-Boruta BuildRequires: python3-devel BuildRequires: python3-setuptools BuildRequires: python3-pip %description -n python3-Boruta # boruta_py # This project hosts Python implementations of the [Boruta all-relevant feature selection method](https://m2.icm.edu.pl/boruta/). [Related blog post] (http://danielhomola.com/2015/05/08/borutapy-an-all-relevant-feature-selection-method/) ## Dependencies ## * numpy * scipy * scikit-learn ## How to use ## Download, import and do as you would with any other scikit-learn method: * fit(X, y) * transform(X) * fit_transform(X, y) ## Description ## Python implementations of the Boruta R package. This implementation tries to mimic the scikit-learn interface, so use fit, transform or fit_transform, to run the feature selection. For more, see the docs of these functions, and the examples below. Original code and method by: Miron B Kursa, https://m2.icm.edu.pl/boruta/ Boruta is an all relevant feature selection method, while most other are minimal optimal; this means it tries to find all features carrying information usable for prediction, rather than finding a possibly compact subset of features on which some classifier has a minimal error. Why bother with all relevant feature selection? When you try to understand the phenomenon that made your data, you should care about all factors that contribute to it, not just the bluntest signs of it in context of your methodology (yes, minimal optimal set of features by definition depends on your classifier choice). ## What's different in BorutaPy? ## It is the original R package recoded in Python with a few added extra features. Some improvements include: * Faster run times, thanks to scikit-learn * Scikit-learn like interface * Compatible with any ensemble method from scikit-learn * Automatic n_estimator selection * Ranking of features For more details, please check the top of the docstring. We highly recommend using pruned trees with a depth between 3-7. Also, after playing around a lot with the original code I identified a few areas where the core algorithm could be improved/altered to make it less strict and more applicable to biological data, where the Bonferroni correction might be overly harsh. __Percentile as threshold__ The original method uses the maximum of the shadow features as a threshold in deciding which real feature is doing better than the shadow ones. This could be overly harsh. To control this, I added the perc parameter, which sets the percentile of the shadow features' importances, the algorithm uses as the threshold. The default of 100 which is equivalent to taking the maximum as the R version of Boruta does, but it could be relaxed. Note, since this is the percentile, it changes with the size of the dataset. With several thousands of features it isn't as stringent as with a few dozens at the end of a Boruta run. __Two step correction for multiple testing__ The correction for multiple testing was relaxed by making it a two step process, rather than a harsh one step Bonferroni correction. We need to correct firstly because in each iteration we test a number of features against the null hypothesis (does a feature perform better than expected by random). For this the Bonferroni correction is used in the original code which is known to be too stringent in such scenarios (at least for biological data), and also the original code corrects for n features, even if we are in the 50th iteration where we only have k< A supervised learning estimator, with a 'fit' method that returns the > feature_importances_ attribute. Important features must correspond to > high absolute values in the feature_importances_. __n_estimators__ : int or string, default = 1000 > If int sets the number of estimators in the chosen ensemble method. > If 'auto' this is determined automatically based on the size of the > dataset. The other parameters of the used estimators need to be set > with initialisation. __perc__ : int, default = 100 > Instead of the max we use the percentile defined by the user, to pick > our threshold for comparison between shadow and real features. The max > tend to be too stringent. This provides a finer control over this. The > lower perc is the more false positives will be picked as relevant but > also the less relevant features will be left out. The usual trade-off. > The default is essentially the vanilla Boruta corresponding to the max. __alpha__ : float, default = 0.05 > Level at which the corrected p-values will get rejected in both correction steps. __two_step__ : Boolean, default = True > If you want to use the original implementation of Boruta with Bonferroni > correction only set this to False. __max_iter__ : int, default = 100 > The number of maximum iterations to perform. __verbose__ : int, default=0 > Controls verbosity of output. ## Attributes ## **n_features_** : int > The number of selected features. **support_** : array of shape [n_features] > The mask of selected features - only confirmed ones are True. **support_weak_** : array of shape [n_features] > The mask of selected tentative features, which haven't gained enough > support during the max_iter number of iterations.. **ranking_** : array of shape [n_features] > The feature ranking, such that ``ranking_[i]`` corresponds to the > ranking position of the i-th feature. Selected (i.e., estimated > best) features are assigned rank 1 and tentative features are assigned > rank 2. ## Examples ## import pandas as pd from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier from boruta import BorutaPy # load X and y # NOTE BorutaPy accepts numpy arrays only, hence the .values attribute X = pd.read_csv('examples/test_X.csv', index_col=0).values y = pd.read_csv('examples/test_y.csv', header=None, index_col=0).values y = y.ravel() # define random forest classifier, with utilising all cores and # sampling in proportion to y labels rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_jobs=-1, class_weight='balanced', max_depth=5) # define Boruta feature selection method feat_selector = BorutaPy(rf, n_estimators='auto', verbose=2, random_state=1) # find all relevant features - 5 features should be selected feat_selector.fit(X, y) # check selected features - first 5 features are selected feat_selector.support_ # check ranking of features feat_selector.ranking_ # call transform() on X to filter it down to selected features X_filtered = feat_selector.transform(X) ## References ## 1. Kursa M., Rudnicki W., "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package" Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 36, Issue 11, Sep 2010 %package help Summary: Development documents and examples for Boruta Provides: python3-Boruta-doc %description help # boruta_py # This project hosts Python implementations of the [Boruta all-relevant feature selection method](https://m2.icm.edu.pl/boruta/). [Related blog post] (http://danielhomola.com/2015/05/08/borutapy-an-all-relevant-feature-selection-method/) ## Dependencies ## * numpy * scipy * scikit-learn ## How to use ## Download, import and do as you would with any other scikit-learn method: * fit(X, y) * transform(X) * fit_transform(X, y) ## Description ## Python implementations of the Boruta R package. This implementation tries to mimic the scikit-learn interface, so use fit, transform or fit_transform, to run the feature selection. For more, see the docs of these functions, and the examples below. Original code and method by: Miron B Kursa, https://m2.icm.edu.pl/boruta/ Boruta is an all relevant feature selection method, while most other are minimal optimal; this means it tries to find all features carrying information usable for prediction, rather than finding a possibly compact subset of features on which some classifier has a minimal error. Why bother with all relevant feature selection? When you try to understand the phenomenon that made your data, you should care about all factors that contribute to it, not just the bluntest signs of it in context of your methodology (yes, minimal optimal set of features by definition depends on your classifier choice). ## What's different in BorutaPy? ## It is the original R package recoded in Python with a few added extra features. Some improvements include: * Faster run times, thanks to scikit-learn * Scikit-learn like interface * Compatible with any ensemble method from scikit-learn * Automatic n_estimator selection * Ranking of features For more details, please check the top of the docstring. We highly recommend using pruned trees with a depth between 3-7. Also, after playing around a lot with the original code I identified a few areas where the core algorithm could be improved/altered to make it less strict and more applicable to biological data, where the Bonferroni correction might be overly harsh. __Percentile as threshold__ The original method uses the maximum of the shadow features as a threshold in deciding which real feature is doing better than the shadow ones. This could be overly harsh. To control this, I added the perc parameter, which sets the percentile of the shadow features' importances, the algorithm uses as the threshold. The default of 100 which is equivalent to taking the maximum as the R version of Boruta does, but it could be relaxed. Note, since this is the percentile, it changes with the size of the dataset. With several thousands of features it isn't as stringent as with a few dozens at the end of a Boruta run. __Two step correction for multiple testing__ The correction for multiple testing was relaxed by making it a two step process, rather than a harsh one step Bonferroni correction. We need to correct firstly because in each iteration we test a number of features against the null hypothesis (does a feature perform better than expected by random). For this the Bonferroni correction is used in the original code which is known to be too stringent in such scenarios (at least for biological data), and also the original code corrects for n features, even if we are in the 50th iteration where we only have k< A supervised learning estimator, with a 'fit' method that returns the > feature_importances_ attribute. Important features must correspond to > high absolute values in the feature_importances_. __n_estimators__ : int or string, default = 1000 > If int sets the number of estimators in the chosen ensemble method. > If 'auto' this is determined automatically based on the size of the > dataset. The other parameters of the used estimators need to be set > with initialisation. __perc__ : int, default = 100 > Instead of the max we use the percentile defined by the user, to pick > our threshold for comparison between shadow and real features. The max > tend to be too stringent. This provides a finer control over this. The > lower perc is the more false positives will be picked as relevant but > also the less relevant features will be left out. The usual trade-off. > The default is essentially the vanilla Boruta corresponding to the max. __alpha__ : float, default = 0.05 > Level at which the corrected p-values will get rejected in both correction steps. __two_step__ : Boolean, default = True > If you want to use the original implementation of Boruta with Bonferroni > correction only set this to False. __max_iter__ : int, default = 100 > The number of maximum iterations to perform. __verbose__ : int, default=0 > Controls verbosity of output. ## Attributes ## **n_features_** : int > The number of selected features. **support_** : array of shape [n_features] > The mask of selected features - only confirmed ones are True. **support_weak_** : array of shape [n_features] > The mask of selected tentative features, which haven't gained enough > support during the max_iter number of iterations.. **ranking_** : array of shape [n_features] > The feature ranking, such that ``ranking_[i]`` corresponds to the > ranking position of the i-th feature. Selected (i.e., estimated > best) features are assigned rank 1 and tentative features are assigned > rank 2. ## Examples ## import pandas as pd from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier from boruta import BorutaPy # load X and y # NOTE BorutaPy accepts numpy arrays only, hence the .values attribute X = pd.read_csv('examples/test_X.csv', index_col=0).values y = pd.read_csv('examples/test_y.csv', header=None, index_col=0).values y = y.ravel() # define random forest classifier, with utilising all cores and # sampling in proportion to y labels rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_jobs=-1, class_weight='balanced', max_depth=5) # define Boruta feature selection method feat_selector = BorutaPy(rf, n_estimators='auto', verbose=2, random_state=1) # find all relevant features - 5 features should be selected feat_selector.fit(X, y) # check selected features - first 5 features are selected feat_selector.support_ # check ranking of features feat_selector.ranking_ # call transform() on X to filter it down to selected features X_filtered = feat_selector.transform(X) ## References ## 1. Kursa M., Rudnicki W., "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package" Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 36, Issue 11, Sep 2010 %prep %autosetup -n Boruta-0.3 %build %py3_build %install %py3_install install -d -m755 %{buildroot}/%{_pkgdocdir} if [ -d doc ]; then cp -arf doc %{buildroot}/%{_pkgdocdir}; fi if [ -d docs ]; then cp -arf docs %{buildroot}/%{_pkgdocdir}; fi if [ -d example ]; then cp -arf example %{buildroot}/%{_pkgdocdir}; fi if [ -d examples ]; then cp -arf examples %{buildroot}/%{_pkgdocdir}; fi pushd %{buildroot} if [ -d usr/lib ]; then find usr/lib -type f -printf "/%h/%f\n" >> filelist.lst fi if [ -d usr/lib64 ]; then find usr/lib64 -type f -printf "/%h/%f\n" >> filelist.lst fi if [ -d usr/bin ]; then find usr/bin -type f -printf "/%h/%f\n" >> filelist.lst fi if [ -d usr/sbin ]; then find usr/sbin -type f -printf "/%h/%f\n" >> filelist.lst fi touch doclist.lst if [ -d usr/share/man ]; then find usr/share/man -type f -printf "/%h/%f.gz\n" >> doclist.lst fi popd mv %{buildroot}/filelist.lst . mv %{buildroot}/doclist.lst . %files -n python3-Boruta -f filelist.lst %dir %{python3_sitelib}/* %files help -f doclist.lst %{_docdir}/* %changelog * Fri Apr 21 2023 Python_Bot - 0.3-1 - Package Spec generated